A- de 2017
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado
✓Claimant Sala De Revision
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Improcedencia por cuanto la exposición de motivos de la solicitud no está dirigida a cuestionar conceptos o frases que ofrezcan motivos de duda
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Solicitud de aclaración y adición de la Sentencia T-102/17, formulada por la Apoderada Especial de la Universidad de La Sabana.
Respecto a la aclaración invocada considera la Sala que la misma no versa sobre una frase o expresión de la parte motiva o resolutiva que resulte ambigua o dudosa, sino que se pretende reabrir un debate concluido con el fallo.
En relación a la segunda petición, considera la Corte que no existe materia sobre la cual resulte necesario adicionar la providencia referida..
Se NIEGA.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- En merito de lo expuesto la Corte Constitucional,
- RESUELVE
- NEGAR la solicitud de aclaracion de la Sentencia T-102 de 2017, presentada por Monica Liliana Osorio Arango, apoderada especial de la Universidad de la Sabana, el 24 de marzo de 2017.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.